search

Sumit Nagal vs Mikelis Libietis Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com

By Wojtek Kolan

At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nagal vs Libietis analysis and find out who is favored!

Our tennis head to head predictions work!
Sign up now!

Up to 78% win accuracy on past h2h matches

Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?

After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:

* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here

If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com  Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.

Sumit Nagal vs Mikelis Libietis Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Nagal 1 - 0 Libietis

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nagal has won 54.5% of points on their second serve, while Libietis has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nagal, in recent form, has won 54.77% of their opponent's second serve points, while Libietis has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.39% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Nagal has saved 62.95% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Libietis has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Nagal has won 63.51% of matches played (W/L 47/ 27), with Libietis winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Nagal has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 223/ 128), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Libietis has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 47/ 24), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 35% (W/L 9/ 17).
  • Player level: In the last year, Nagal has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 70.59% of matches (W/L 36/ 15), where as Libietis has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nagal winning 1 times and Libietis being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Nagal winning 2 and Libietis winning 1. The last match between Nagal and Libietis was at the Thailand F9, 30-11-2015, Quarterfinals, Hard with Sumit Nagal getting the victory 3-6 6-1 3-0 ret..
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:22:0.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Nagal and Libietis have played a deciding set 0 times, with Nagal winning 0 times and Libietis 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Nagal winning 0, and Libietis 0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nagal has played against opponents with an average rank of 252.32 while Libietis has played against players with an average rank of .
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nagal has won 52% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Libietis has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Nagal has converted 45.95% of breakpoint opportunities, and Libietis has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
  • If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
bet365
Sumit Nagal

15

Total

0

Mast

6

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

9

Minor

72

Rank

71

High

26

Age

R

Plays

1

Total

0

1

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

714

Rank

352

High

31

Age

R

Plays

Mikelis Libietis

6

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

6

Minor

1

Total

0

1

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

W W W W W W W W W L

Form

L W L W L L L W L L

61% (326-208)

Career Total W/L

56% (83-64)

66% (27-14)

YTD W/L

0% (0-0)

$434,190

Career Prize Money

$0

2

YTD Titles

0

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

banner

The Best Odds For Sumit Nagal vs Mikelis Libietis For Any Market:

We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:

Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Nagal VS Libietis

Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!

Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting

Nagal VS Libietis H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

stats Sumit Nagal Mikelis Libietis
All H2H Matches 1 0
Sets Won 2 1
Games Won 12 7
Aces (Total) 2 3
DFs Total 3 2
Avg Match Time 1:22:0 1:22:0
1st Serve % 60% (31/52) 65% (44/68)
1st Serve Win% 77% (24/31) 57% (25/44)
2nd Serve Win% 62% (13/21) 42% (10/24)
BPs Won% (Total) 40% (4/10) 50% (1/2)
Return Points W% 49% (33/68) 29% (15/52)
Best of 3 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets W% 100% (1/1) 0% (0/1)
TBs Win% (Total) 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, W 0% (0/0) 0% (1/0)
1st set W, L 0% (0/0) 100% (1/1)
1st set L, W 100% (1/1) 0% (0/0)

Nagal VS Libietis H2h Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
3-6 6-1 3-0 ret.
cross
Sumit Nagal
Player
Mikelis Libietis
60% ( 31 of 52)
1st Serve %
65% ( 44 of 68)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
77% ( 24 of 31)
1st Serve Won
57% ( 25 of 44)
62% ( 13 of 21)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 10 of 24)
40% ( 4 of 10)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
29% ( 15 of 52)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 33 of 68)
70
Total Points Won
50

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

stats Sumit Nagal Mikelis Libietis
YTD W/L 66% (27/14) 0% (0/0)
Sets Win/Loss 63% (62/37) 0% (0/0)
Games Win/Loss 54% (506/434) 0% (0/0)
Hard Win/Loss 64% (14/8) 0% (0/0)
Clay Win/Loss 68% (13/6) 0% (0/0)
Indoor Hard W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Aces pg 0.14 0
Aces Total 66 0
DFs per game 0.12 0
DFs Total 56 0
Avg Match Time 1:56:10 1st Match
Avg Opp Rank 221.56 0
1st Serve % 71% (2154/3031) 0% (0/0)
1st Serve W% 66% (1421/2154) 0% (0/0)
2nd Serve W% 55% (478/877) 0% (0/0)
BPs Won% Total 46% (136/296) 0% (0/0)
Return Pts W% 41% (1220/3006) 0% (0/0)
Slam W/L 67% (4/2) 0% (0/0)
Masters W/L 50% (4/4) 0% (0/0)
Cups W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L 25% (1/3) 0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L 78% (18/5) 0% (0/0)
Futures W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Best of 3 Sets W% 68% (26/38) 0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets W% 33% (1/3) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 62% (8/13) 0% (0/0)
Deciding Set W% 54% (7/13) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, W 83% (29/24) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, L 17% (29/5) 0% (0/0)
1st set L, W 25% (12/3) 0% (0/0)

Sumit Nagal Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
F
cross
Luciano Darderi
Player
Sumit Nagal
62% ( 23 of 37)
1st Serve %
77% ( 33 of 43)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
96% ( 22 of 23)
1st Serve Won
36% ( 12 of 33)
36% ( 5 of 14)
2nd Serve Won
40% ( 4 of 10)
75% ( 6 of 8)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
27% ( 10 of 37)
Rtn Points Won
63% ( 27 of 43)
54
Total Points Won
26
L
6-1 6-2 H2H
SF
cross
Sumit Nagal
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
80% ( 78 of 98)
1st Serve %
75% ( 63 of 84)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
62% ( 48 of 78)
1st Serve Won
65% ( 41 of 63)
35% ( 7 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
24% ( 5 of 21)
63% ( 5 of 8)
Break Points Won
45% ( 5 of 11)
44% ( 43 of 98)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 38 of 84)
93
Total Points Won
89
W
7-6(2) 1-6 6-2 H2H
QF
cross
Sumit Nagal
Player
Maks Kasnikowski
72% ( 48 of 67)
1st Serve %
64% ( 43 of 67)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
71% ( 34 of 48)
1st Serve Won
67% ( 29 of 43)
68% ( 13 of 19)
2nd Serve Won
46% ( 11 of 24)
38% ( 3 of 8)
Break Points Won
17% ( 1 of 6)
30% ( 20 of 67)
Rtn Points Won
40% ( 27 of 67)
74
Total Points Won
60
W
6-4 7-5 H2H
R2
cross
Sumit Nagal
Player
Alessandro Giannessi
78% ( 80 of 103)
1st Serve %
69% ( 72 of 104)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
59% ( 47 of 80)
1st Serve Won
65% ( 47 of 72)
48% ( 11 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
53% ( 17 of 32)
60% ( 3 of 5)
Break Points Won
45% ( 5 of 11)
44% ( 45 of 103)
Rtn Points Won
38% ( 40 of 104)
98
Total Points Won
109
W
0-6 7-5 7-6(5) H2H
R1
cross
Sumit Nagal
Player
Nerman Fatic
81% ( 46 of 57)
1st Serve %
71% ( 60 of 84)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
76% ( 35 of 46)
1st Serve Won
60% ( 36 of 60)
73% ( 8 of 11)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 9 of 24)
33% ( 3 of 9)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
25% ( 14 of 57)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 39 of 84)
82
Total Points Won
59
W
7-6(1) 6-2 H2H
F
cross
Sumit Nagal
Player
Alexander Ritschard
72% ( 77 of 107)
1st Serve %
57% ( 51 of 90)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
64% ( 49 of 77)
1st Serve Won
59% ( 30 of 51)
50% ( 15 of 30)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 17 of 39)
40% ( 6 of 15)
Break Points Won
23% ( 3 of 13)
40% ( 43 of 107)
Rtn Points Won
48% ( 43 of 90)
107
Total Points Won
90
W
6-1 6-7(5) 6-3 H2H
SF
cross
Sumit Nagal
Player
Luca Van Assche
68% ( 55 of 81)
1st Serve %
55% ( 41 of 74)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
69% ( 38 of 55)
1st Serve Won
71% ( 29 of 41)
42% ( 11 of 26)
2nd Serve Won
30% ( 10 of 33)
36% ( 5 of 14)
Break Points Won
33% ( 3 of 9)
40% ( 32 of 81)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 35 of 74)
84
Total Points Won
71
W
6-2 7-6(5) H2H
QF
cross
Sumit Nagal
Player
Ivan Gakhov
84% ( 47 of 56)
1st Serve %
63% ( 39 of 62)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
70% ( 33 of 47)
1st Serve Won
51% ( 20 of 39)
67% ( 6 of 9)
2nd Serve Won
57% ( 13 of 23)
100% ( 4 of 4)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
30% ( 17 of 56)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 29 of 62)
68
Total Points Won
50
W
6-1 7-6(4) H2H
R2
cross
Sumit Nagal
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
60% ( 28 of 47)
1st Serve %
61% ( 44 of 72)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
79% ( 22 of 28)
1st Serve Won
55% ( 24 of 44)
58% ( 11 of 19)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 12 of 28)
29% ( 5 of 17)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
30% ( 14 of 47)
Rtn Points Won
50% ( 36 of 72)
69
Total Points Won
50
W
6-4 6-1 H2H
R1
cross
Sumit Nagal
Player
Nikoloz Basilashvili
63% ( 52 of 82)
1st Serve %
43% ( 30 of 70)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
62% ( 32 of 52)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 19 of 30)
57% ( 17 of 30)
2nd Serve Won
48% ( 19 of 40)
71% ( 5 of 7)
Break Points Won
36% ( 4 of 11)
40% ( 33 of 82)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 32 of 70)
81
Total Points Won
71
W
6-2 1-6 6-3 H2H

Mikelis Libietis Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
Q1
cross
Sekou Bangoura
Player
Mikelis Libietis
66% ( 35 of 53)
1st Serve %
45% ( 19 of 42)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
71% ( 25 of 35)
1st Serve Won
74% ( 14 of 19)
61% ( 11 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
30% ( 7 of 23)
80% ( 4 of 5)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 4)
32% ( 17 of 53)
Rtn Points Won
50% ( 21 of 42)
57
Total Points Won
38
L
6-1 6-2 H2H
Q2
L
2-6 6-3 10-8 H2H
Q1
W
6-2 6-1 H2H
R1
L
6-3 6-1 H2H
Q1
cross
Filip Peliwo
Player
Mikelis Libietis
61% ( 31 of 51)
1st Serve %
44% ( 22 of 50)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
77% ( 24 of 31)
1st Serve Won
73% ( 16 of 22)
70% ( 14 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 12 of 28)
75% ( 3 of 4)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
25% ( 13 of 51)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 22 of 50)
60
Total Points Won
41
L
6-3 6-2 H2H
Q2
cross
Julian Zlobinsky
Player
Mikelis Libietis
47% ( 41 of 88)
1st Serve %
61% ( 44 of 72)
1
Aces
11
8
Double Faults
5
76% ( 31 of 41)
1st Serve Won
66% ( 29 of 44)
49% ( 23 of 47)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 12 of 28)
57% ( 4 of 7)
Break Points Won
25% ( 3 of 12)
39% ( 34 of 88)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 31 of 72)
85
Total Points Won
75
L
6-4 7-6(3) H2H
R2
cross
Pierre Faivre
Player
Mikelis Libietis
53% ( 29 of 55)
1st Serve %
52% ( 32 of 62)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
66% ( 19 of 29)
1st Serve Won
53% ( 17 of 32)
65% ( 17 of 26)
2nd Serve Won
60% ( 18 of 30)
25% ( 2 of 8)
Break Points Won
17% ( 1 of 6)
35% ( 19 of 55)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 27 of 62)
63
Total Points Won
54
L
7-6(5) 2-1 ret. H2H
R1
cross
Mikelis Libietis
Player
Fabian Gruber
75% ( 27 of 36)
1st Serve %
74% ( 31 of 42)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
85% ( 23 of 27)
1st Serve Won
39% ( 12 of 31)
22% ( 2 of 9)
2nd Serve Won
18% ( 2 of 11)
43% ( 6 of 14)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 1)
31% ( 11 of 36)
Rtn Points Won
67% ( 28 of 42)
53
Total Points Won
25
W
6-0 6-0 H2H
R2
cross
Robin Stanek
Player
Mikelis Libietis
70% ( 43 of 61)
1st Serve %
56% ( 33 of 59)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
63% ( 27 of 43)
1st Serve Won
48% ( 16 of 33)
67% ( 12 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
54% ( 14 of 26)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
17% ( 1 of 6)
36% ( 22 of 61)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 29 of 59)
68
Total Points Won
52
L
6-4 6-3 H2H
R1
W
4-6 6-3 6-4 H2H

Nagal Vs Libietis Prediction H2H Images To Share

More tennis photos of Nagal are available here and Libietis photos here.


Potential H2H Matches This Week For Sumit Nagal

Wimbledon - London

Fucsovics vs Nagal H2H Pick , could play in The Third round

Berrettini vs Nagal H2H Pick , could play in The Third round

Hanfmann vs Nagal H2H Pick , could play in The Third round

Sinner vs Nagal H2H Pick , could play in The Third round

Nagal vs Griekspoor H2H Pick , could play in The Second round

Nagal vs Carreno-Busta H2H Pick , could play in The Second round

Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions

Unlock All Predictions